Showing posts with label Archaeology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Archaeology. Show all posts

Friday, October 30, 2015

Control: A Key Standard of Scientific Method


Nine key standards, or principles, of scientific research can be gleaned from texts on research method. As I see them, these are:

3. Control
4. Measurability
5. Validity
6. Reliability (Pending)
7. Objectivity (Pending)
8. Ethics 
9. Representativeness.

I say something about each of the nine standards in other posts. What I want to briefly talk about here is the control standard. 

Control

By control we mean establishing or maintaining the integrity or identity or boundaries of the sample/specimen/subject/site against all disturbance, unwanted/unintended influence or “contamination” by external/extraneous factors or even by the researcher himself or herself. In effect, control means quality control. 

In experimental design, Yu (n.d.) points out, the kind of control called for is, specifically, variance control  -- which is indeed a form of quality control. According to Leedy, control suggests establishing parameters: “Parameters are important. All research is conducted within an area sealed off by given parametric limitations. By such control, we isolate those factors which are critical to the research. Control is important for replication. An experiment should be repeated under the identical conditions and in the identical way in which it was first carried out. It is also important for consistency with the research design” (Leedy, 1980: 46).

Giorgio (n.d.) notes that, in the laboratory setting, the control function tends to be too narrowly carried out in practice, in a way that even conceptually distorts the meaning of control. Thus:
"...control practically comes to mean manipulate. That is because the laboratory setting is itself the creation of the scientist, and it is deliberately created in order for the researcher to be able to dictate to the situation. Any thing that is left to chance is seen as a demerit. The dictionary con firms these ideas by defining control as exercising “authority or dominating influence over; to hold in restraint or check; to direct or regulate.” Thus a strong sense of control means being able to do things at will, to be able to have desires transformed into realities in as brief a time as it takes to accomplish the task."
But, he argues, "control does not have to be defined so narrowly." Thus, for him, control:
"...could mean to be respectfully present in a situation so that one could respond knowledgeably and appropriately with readiness to the perceived spontaneous happenings of a situation. In this sense, control refers to a certain kind of “intentional presence,” a certain way of looking, an informed being present that at the same time does not actively intervene in the unfolding of the event to be observed... [The] knowledge that the researcher has guides his expectations so that he knows how to interpret or evaluate his ongoing perceptions. The researcher can do this without active intervention, but it is still a form of control because directedness and restraint are used by the researcher in perceiving the situation. Thus control implies observation, that is, it is an educated looking."
Admittedly, in the social sciences, in contrast to the natural sciences, control is more varied and more nuanced, and sometimes more problematic, but not impossible. For example, determining the parameters of, or controlling for variance in, a social research includes such considerations as scope and study limitations. Moreover, one can ensure control over the following, among others: [1] the setting of the interview, or the conditions under which the respondent is interviewed, [2] the accuracy/precision of the questions asked and the responses given. [3] the language of the interview. [4] the quality of training given to interviewers, other research assistants and supervisors. [5] the actual supervision process. [6] the parameters of both the experimental and the control group.

Archaeologists and paleontologists, who do not represent the image of the typical natural scientist, and who routinely work away from the public view, offer outstanding templates for quality control in their persistent quest for new discoveries. They are quite adept at protecting the sites of their ongoing work against contamination and interference, in time and space. In important ways, the work of the crime (or accident) investigator, often partially done in full view of the media and the public, at its best obeys the strictures of the control standard,

Clearly, controls are crucial not just in experimental designs and field observations, but also, and perhaps more dramatically so, in all situations in which the conscious and pre-emptive gathering and establishing of incontrovertible evidence is called for; for example, in the prosecutor's mandate, or in the context of a claim to/of the discovery of a consequential artifact. Both of which are typically subjected to strict and detailed scrutiny, skepticism and even attack.



REFERENCES:

Leedy, Paul D. (1980) Practical Research: Planning and Design. Second Edition. New York:  Macmillan Publishing Co.,

Giorgi, Amedeo (n.d.) "The Role of Observation and Control in Laboratory and Field Research Settings"

Jaikumar, Maheswari (2014) "Experimental Research Design" Slideshare.net

Mann, CJ (2003) "Observational Research Methods. Research Design II: Cohort, Cross Sectional and Case-Control Studies"

Yu, Chong-Ho (n.d.) "Experimental Design as Variance Control"

Tuesday, January 04, 2011

Out of Africa: A Comment on Dr. Alice Roberts' "The Incredible Human Journey"

On December 28, 2010 (as part of my holiday fare), I watched for the first time, on BBC Knowledge (relayed by DSTV), Alice Roberts' documentary titled "The Incredible Human Journey".

This is not the first TV account of human migration out of Africa, based ultimately on qualitative evidence -- evidence gleaned, as in certain earlier accounts, in part from archaeology, anthropology and climatology; but mostly from DNA databases. And because it is not the first, it lacks that indelible "first teller's" aha moment that some of us have already been exposed to (and told and retold in lectures). Nevertheless, it remains an incredible rendition, in its own right, of our ancestors' drive, weed-like, at once single-minded and unintended, toward world "domination"; a drive to claim and take possession of an entire planet -- and beyond the planet, going "forth", who knows?

Her documentary adds refreshing twists (and certain images) to the broad, paradigm-shifting, technicolor script:

Such as the chain-reaction (or a sort of kalausi) of human movement -- up and down, east and west, round and round -- that went on for millennia within the African continent before the original "China Syndrome" moment was reached; and with it, the release.

Such as the journey through Turkey and up the Danube (wonder if they gave an ancient name to that river as they rowed and remarked upon its convenience) into greater Europa.

Such as sailing down the west coast of the Americas, after a long, but always driven, wandering through Siberia's permafrost -- into the northern badlands and, farther (across the equator once again), into the deep jungles of the South. [Or was it simply a hugging and not letting go of the coastline, rather than dedicated sailing, perhaps enticed by the sudden abundance of (sea) food, and discouraged by the rugged hilliness of Alaska? I ask this because I wonder: Where and when would necessity have prompted this branch of migrants (not being, I suppose, the ones who rowed up the Danube) to invent and develop sea-faring technology (hardware and software) during the thousands of years that they lived deep in Siberia?]

The documentary is in turn testament to the grandeur and connectedness of Ms. Roberts' own awe-inspiring, passionate, umbilical journey.

And I would like to share it with you (click here to see)

Postscript: Sorry, just found out that the video is no longer available on YouTube. Instead, a DVD version can be purchased online ~MY, April 28, 2012.

SEE SAMPLE OF THE BOOK HERE: Alice Roberts' (2009) The Incredible Human Journey: The Story of How We Colonised the Planet. London: Bloomsbury