Emergency Toolkit Lab (CSO 587) ~ Past Examination Papers (August 2003 to May 2013)

For the benefit of graduate students in Emergency Toolkit Lab, I have scanned fifteen end-of-semester examination papers in the course, covering the period from August 2003 to May 2013. These are only such papers as I had access to as course lecturer and, consequently, invigilator.

As I noted in a piece I wrote nearly a year ago (read it here), "Past Papers" is a powerful meme in student circles. One may add, indeed, that while most candidates have a mild to severe craving for these papers, no setter of examination questions can, literally speaking, live the life of such a one with equanimity -- that is, without the confusion all too readily taken for absentmindedness -- without a fistful of past papers. 

Not knowing what is already asked, one risks -- with successive settings -- asking questions that are already "known". In so doing, one not only abolishes in one clumsy swoop the suspense so emblematic of an examination room, but also makes it impossible for flashes of brilliance to show, dramatically, through. 

Questions (examination questions) must never be literally known in advance. And yet, and yet, too much suspense and anxiety and uncertainty is not conducive to healthy learning and, more pertinently here, optimal answering.

All that said, I wish to share the following past papers, which cover the period stated above: Click here 




Reference:

Yambo, Mauri (2014) Emergency Toolkit Laboratory (CSO 587): Introduction to the Course

Past Papers

Past Papers is a powerful meme in student circles. The drive to lay one's hands on past examination papers has been around for decades, as I remember. Having them was, so it was presumed, a legitimate way to reduce the vagaries of chance in the examination room; a way to read the examiner's mind ahead of time and to 'prosper'. That is, a way to level the playing field, and thus to optimize the probable score. Did it ever work? It did, I think, for many, over the years. But it required a certain capacity for predictive deduction, a method of dealing with fuzzy or 'big' data and seeing the future that we used without knowing the term that stood for it. Let me restate that, just to stay on the point a moment longer: we practised predictive deduction long, long before we were to know that we had been engaged in it. I suppose that there are many such moments, such abductions, in all our pasts. The room for error and anxiety was always considerable, for just as many -- despite the method.

You will find more discussion of predictive deduction applications in this text. 

Lecturers at the UoN make available to their students past papers and/or other material related to their courses via one or more of the following ways: (1) selectively giving out excess originals, (2) making photocopies at their own expense for use by class (usually small classes), (3) temporarily placing scarce 'originals' in on-campus photocopy kiosks, (4) lending copies directly to class reps to enable class members to make and pay for their own copies at places of their choice, (5) distributing copies as email attachments.

The university library system is supposed to be depository of past papers from all faculties, but the service is far from satisfactory because the system simply isn't working. It won't until all the material is properly gathered at the end of each examination period, meticulously collated and classified, serialized and -- above all -- posted online. Until then, I am happy to make my past papers available on my blog, having installed my own scanning equipment at home. There is none at the office.

Still, the pressure to update sets of papers in a timely manner remains a 'clerical' challenge, what with all the other stuff that one must simultaneously do. I still send by email a good number of sets, more particularly the most recent papers.