Showing posts with label Mind. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mind. Show all posts

Monday, February 26, 2018

CONCEPT: Concepts


We live in a concept-mediated and concept-loaded world. We cannot escape concepts. Indeed, mixed into our physical Earth and its airy atmosphere is another sphere -- a component of a much larger sphere that I have elsewhere called the memetic sphere. Things of planet Earth, and of the universe at large, are of course out there in the material sphere (and ipso facto outside of the mind), but don't mean a thing to us until we process them in the mind and give them a name of sorts -- that is, until we thus attach to them a set or sets of concepts (that is, memes), which is the only available path to actualizing our sense impressions. 


Likewise, alleged 'figments' of the imagination cease to be figments and become real 'things' just as soon as we're able to observe the facts that underpin the claims they embody, and can affirm our 'encounter' with them -- and, more importantly, tag them with a name. Incidentally, figments of the imagination and other un-grounded products of thought may pass as concepts too, but only as meta versions and as 'material' for artistic production and reproduction or for philosophical engagement.

Concepts are in their own universe, as well -- and thus a universe of sorts. Without concepts, there would be no learning, and nothing akin to what we call intelligence, and even what we call community. There would be no capacity to tell what there would be to tell, and what there (ever) was to pass on.

Concepts are key to all understanding -- and all missed understandings. Without them, language and speech would be preemptively gibberish, and could not arise from, after all, a non-existent language -- even for potentially the most eloquent and the most erudite individuals. Without concepts, all bodies of knowledge would be formless and one big mess of nothing without anchor. In a word, their efficacy presupposes some kind of anchoring on arrays of conceptualization. 


Our concepts have raced well ahead of us. They have reached the farthest known and imaginable realms of Being (of existence and reality) -- and even Nothingness, as Marcuse and others sought to see them. They've gone to places we ourselves (we humans) will never, may never, physically be. They've even ventured into the sun's core and into Black Holes, and on to dying stars and stars just fixing to be born -- and to galaxies which answer back in tongues, after a fashion. They have gone back in Time to Big Bang's singular and very own moment -- or so they say. 

As several scholars such as Dawkins and others (discussed in Yambo, 2012) have noted already, concepts are, for bodies of knowledge, gene-equivalents in the cultural universe. That is, they are memes which make everything make any sense at all in the physical and the social and the spiritual worlds. Concepts empower us to achieve the transition from the raw to the cooked -- that is, to the nets and webs of insight and understanding essential to apprehending our diverse realities and mastering our ever-present challenges. 

It is for these reasons that we start (indeed, must start) our journey, in any field of learning or problem-solving, armed with a set of concepts that we will need (and need to build on and add to in ever more specialized ways) along the way -- that is, Key Concepts. Key concepts may sound like a tiresome cliche, but they are, singularly or in bunches, truly key to understanding both seemingly simple and manifestly complex ideas, and to solving the associated theoretical, methodological and practical problems.




UPDATED: March 5, 2018.

Friday, April 15, 2016

Saturday, June 20, 2015

Music, Written Text and the Literate Mind


The literate mind is, I think, more charitable to (the frailties of) the spoken word, than to the written. This is perhaps because, in a great ironic twist, the spoken word has deep roots in the preliterate mind, which we have not quite lost.

The preliterate mind is by definition more aural than textual.

It is far easier to produce great music, than to write great text. And far easier to come upon fine music, than upon fine 'text' -- if you come to think about it.

Music so very often and so easily makes even banal words/lyrics soar into the poetic heavens.

Great literary or scientific text is incapable of dominating the airwaves, as music does. Such a text is not, alas, sexy enough for a 4:12-minute ecosystem.

And yet, for the literate (as for the closed) mind, great music -- in particular, of the popular variety -- when weighed against great scientific or creative literature (or the written word in general), simultaneously appears:


1. Less mainstream as a continual point of reference; and,
2. Even less consequential for important matters of day-to-day life -- a luxury lay society and culture can ill-afford.


But how ill-conceived is all that! How many insights have thus passed us by, and how many opportunities lost? 

Tuesday, May 06, 2014

Othello & Wambui

The mind is in all that
We say and do,
And see.

But is what Wambui
Says, and does,
All in Othello's mind? 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A suggested read: The Merchant of Venice   

Friday, April 15, 2011

Marshall McLuhan's Four Laws of Media

McLuhan, the media sociologist/guru who coined the term 'Global Village', propounded Four Laws of Media which capture a veritably spiraling dialectic -- a quaint, never-ending, forth-and-back cyle of Synthesis-Antithesis-Thesis-Synthesis -- of media technology and segmented social life.

I read the Four Laws as follows:

1. EXTENSION/AMPLIFICATION: As they come to the fore, new media technologies extend the reach of certain pre-existing capacities of Mind and aspects of Body.

2. REVERSAL/'COUNTER-DIALECTIC': All media revolutions embody the trigger or potential for reverse motion (a counter-dialectic); that is, for a step-back from the gains they represent -- for a reset to a bygone era.

3. RETRIEVAL/RECURRENCE: Newly-invented media tend to resuscitate the senses, skills and/or sensibilities which the displaced technological order had dulled,'suppressed' or obscured.

4. OBSOLESCENCE: New media in effect coopt certain older modes of communication even as they declare them 'obsolete' and render them ineffective; and they do so because the latter do not allow themselves to disappear entirely, even as the impression of something altogether new takes root in the landscape.



PostScript: Do read this 2012 paper:
Sandstrom, Gregory.2012. "Laws of Media -- The Four Effects: A McLuhan Contribution to Social Epistemology" Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1 (12): 1-6

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

A Sunny Day

A sunny, sunny day. Sunny on the body politic. Sunnier, still, in the mind.
Tho mornings be still chancy, my friends.

Friday, September 25, 2009

Surrealist Mindgames & Else: This U Gotta C

This surrealist Phenomenology of Mind isn't what GWF Hegel had in mind, is it? No, it's not. This sort of mindgame is another kettle of fish altogether; or shall I say, fis?

Click here to see what I mean. What the mind, a charged mind, and a camera can do. What can such a player play?

Isn't that a feast. A fistful of something or other, which (let's look at it one more time with our bearings just right, & eyes & minds wide open) let's see & locate!